Open Access


Read more
image01

Online Manuscript Submission


Read more
image01

Submitted Manuscript Trail


Read more
image01

Online Payment


Read more
image01

Online Subscription


Read more
image01

Email Alert



Read more
image01

Original Research Article | OPEN ACCESS

Antidiabetic efficacy of aqueous fruit extract of Amla (Emblica officinalis, Gaertn) in streptozotocin-induced diabetes mellitus in male rats

Mai A Elobeid1 , Elham A Ahmed2

1Department of Zoology, Faculty of Science, King Saud University, Women’s Students-Medical Studies & Sciences Section, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia; 2Department of Biomedical Sciences-Biology Unit, University of Science and Technology, Khartoum, Sudan.

For correspondence:-  Mai Elobeid   Email: maielobeid@gmail.com   Tel:+66596404543

Received: 26 January 2015        Accepted: 25 April 2015        Published: 26 May 2015

Citation: Elobeid MA, Ahmed EA. Antidiabetic efficacy of aqueous fruit extract of Amla (Emblica officinalis, Gaertn) in streptozotocin-induced diabetes mellitus in male rats. Trop J Pharm Res 2015; 14(5):801-806 doi: 10.4314/tjpr.v14i5.9

© 2015 The authors.
This is an Open Access article that uses a funding model which does not charge readers or their institutions for access and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0) and the Budapest Open Access Initiative (http://www.budapestopenaccessinitiative.org/read), which permit unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited..

Abstract

Purpose: To investigate the antidiabetic potential of Emblica officinalis, Gaertn on diabetic rats.
Methods: The study investigated the anti-hyperglycemic potential of the aqueous fruit extract of amla (E. officianalis, for eleven weeks in streptozotocin-induced diabetic obese rats. The study utilized forty eight rats divided into four groups as follows. Untreated diabetic control (group 1) received 2 % gum acacia as vehicle; groups 2 and 3 were diabetic rats administered the fruit extract in 400 and 200 mg/kg doses, respectively; while group 4 (diabetic rats) received metformin (600 mg/kg) as reference drug. The parameters assessed weekly were body weight, as well as fasting blood glucose, cholesterol and triglyceride levels in venous blood.
Results: Both plant extract-treated groups showed significant (p ≤ 0.001) reduction in blood glucose levels in the fifth and sixth weeks compared to the metformin-treated group. Body weight significantly increased during the fourth, fifth and sixth weeks, being more pronounced in the extract-treated groups (272 ± 15.0 g and 227 ± 7.23 g for 200 and 400 mg/kg doses, respectively; the corresponding body weight for untreated diabetic control was 197 ± 9.83 g. Furthermore, both extract doses (200 and 400 mg/kg) produced significant decrease (p ≥ 0.05) in serum glucose (186 ± 15.5 mg/L and 146 ± 15.1 mg/L), cholesterol (143.6 ± 0.86 mg/L and 151.0 ± 0.77mg/L) and triglyceride (82.6 ± 0.51mg/dl and 84.8 ± 0.84 m/dl) levels, respectively, similar to the metformin treated group.
Conclusion: The anti-diabetic activity of the aqueous extract of E. officianalis used showed a better potential than metformin.

Keywords: Antidiabetic, Emblica officianalis fruit, Obesity, Glucose, Cholesterol, Triglycerides

Impact Factor
Thompson Reuters (ISI): 0.523 (2021)
H-5 index (Google Scholar): 39 (2021)

Article Tools

Share this article with



Article status: Free
Fulltext in PDF
Similar articles in Google
Similar article in this Journal:

Archives

2024; 23: 
1,   2,   3,   4
2023; 22: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2022; 21: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2021; 20: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2020; 19: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2019; 18: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2018; 17: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2017; 16: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2016; 15: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2015; 14: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2014; 13: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2013; 12: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2012; 11: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2011; 10: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2010; 9: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2009; 8: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2008; 7: 
1,   2,   3,   4
2007; 6: 
1,   2,   3,   4
2006; 5: 
1,   2
2005; 4: 
1,   2
2004; 3: 
1
2003; 2: 
1,   2
2002; 1: 
1,   2

News Updates